Online access to case information for payments in pick out juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases may be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
one zero one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Topic: Appeal At times it is convenient for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to get rid of a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got attained to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's got reached these types of stage. Read more
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to make it acceptable to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed inside the bank and considering that only the appellants were posted on the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
It's now perfectly-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different, therefore, in our view the learned Judge experienced fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner with the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed through the respondent/Institute, these rules might not have the operates within a transparent legal and regulatory framework in the respondent/Institute. fourteen. In view of what continues to be discussed higher than, without touching the merits in the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition is sustained as well as the petition is held to generally be not maintainable in terms of Article 199 in the Constitution for the reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio with the judgment passed from the Supreme Court inside the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government businesses in regards to projects that could perhaps pose a public risk. This case can be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all foreseeable future public interest litigation brought before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found during the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination can be a right to life itself.
Some pluralist systems, like Scots legislation in Scotland and types of civil law jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, never specifically match into the dual common-civil legislation system classifications. These types of systems may perhaps have been seriously influenced with the Anglo-American common law tradition; however, their substantive law is firmly rooted inside the civil legislation tradition.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which include eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature on the seized currency.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears plus a new system is set in its place.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to become gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this more info amendment and its potential to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity in the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of these changes is vital for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a robust legal system.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition towards the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Growth Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter being a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) of your Pakistan Constitution provides authentic jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and recognized scientists to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.